![Web application firewall best](https://cdn2.cdnme.se/5447227/9-3/screenshot_4_64e629479606ee5be4b9a969.jpg)
Removing such duplicates is an essential task to ensure systematic reviewers do not waste time screening the same citation multiple times. Although reference management software use algorithms to remove duplicate records, this is only partially successful and necessitates removing the remaining duplicates manually.
![endnote citations endnote citations](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/V3IW_waPKTw/maxresdefault.jpg)
![endnote citations endnote citations](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/endnotebasic-formphstudents-iub2014-140315225930-phpapp02/95/endnote-basic-citation-utility-for-research-support-71-638.jpg)
This time-consuming task leads to wasted resources.
![endnote citations endnote citations](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/endnotebasic-formphstudents-iub2014-140315225930-phpapp02/95/endnote-basic-citation-utility-for-research-support-44-638.jpg)
We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed deduplication program against EndNote. MethodsĪ literature search of 1,988 citations was manually inspected and duplicate citations identified and coded to create a benchmark dataset. The Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module (SRA-DM) was iteratively developed and tested using the benchmark dataset and compared with EndNote’s default one step auto-deduplication process matching on (‘author’, ‘year’, ‘title’). The accuracy of deduplication was reported by calculating the sensitivity and specificity. Further validation tests, with three additional benchmarked literature searches comprising a total of 4,563 citations were performed to determine the reliability of the SRA-DM algorithm. The sensitivity (84%) and specificity (100%) of the SRA-DM was superior to EndNote (sensitivity 51%, specificity 99.83%). OpenURL enables you to try to find access to an item via Harvard's system.Validation testing on three additional biomedical literature searches demonstrated that SRA-DM consistently achieved higher sensitivity than EndNote (90% vs 63%), (84% vs 73%) and (84% vs 64%).EndNote's Find Full Text feature allows you to pull the full text (PDF) for a journal article into your EndNote library.Registering allows you to sync your EndNote library across different devices or to share your EndNote library with collaborators.If you continue to experience issues, please report the issue to HUIT, as the FAS downloads page is maintained by HUIT. Please note that if you are an FAS affiliate and the link to the FAS downloads page doesn't work for you, first try a different browser or private/incognito window. FAS students, faculty, and staff can download EndNote free of charge from the FAS software downloads page.Anyone can try EndNote without purchase - check out their 30-day trial.Harvard ID holders can get an education discount through HUIT's third-party web store managed by OntheHub network.
![Web application firewall best](https://cdn2.cdnme.se/5447227/9-3/screenshot_4_64e629479606ee5be4b9a969.jpg)